Bird and Fish Die-off conspiracy theory gets more interesting as dots are connected between (1) HAARP, (2) weather modification, (3) the FEMA emergency exercise scheduled to take place in Arkansas in May and (4) the New Madrid faultline. But in order for any of this to make sense, you need to know what "HAARP" is. If you don't know what HAARP is, check this out first:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZOt29NR0FY
Now, on with connecting dots. Someone noticed that HAARP deleted (or conveniently "lost") its data records from the day prior to the big Haiti earthquake of last year. How does this relate back to the bird and fish situation? There are two sources of information to look at:
This video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=muyu4aucZDM#!
And this page, which is a commentary on that video:
http://alienpet13.com/2011/01/06/haarp-coverup-haarp-deleted-records-from-2010-1-11-from-day-before-haiti-earthquake/
That commentary page notes that there is no confirmation that permanent Digisonde devices are located at the triangulated bird-die-off points but suggests that there might be such a thing as mobile Digisonde units that could be placed anywhere and then removed at any time. I found confirmation that mobile Digisonde units do, in fact, exist and were created at The University of Massachusetts Lowell’s Center for Atmospheric Research (UMLCAR). Photos and details:
http://jro.igp.gob.pe/digisonde/dps4text.htm
If you check out the videos and web pages that I've posted here you'll see how these dots become connnected. Is it all just "coincidence"? Are these things all "unrelated" to each other as the "officials" on the TV news are telling us? I don't know, but all enough to make you go, "Hmm..." or maybe just a flat out "WTF!".
Friday, January 7, 2011
Sunday, August 15, 2010
CHANNELING: An Alternative Explanation
I’ve been intrigued for years by the phenomenon known as channeling. I first became aware of this activity back in the 1970s with the publication of The Seth Material by Jane Roberts. The next popular channeler to hit the scene was J.Z. Knight, channeling the entity named Ramtha. Then came Lee Carroll’s Kryon. Soon there was Sheldon Nidle and the Galactic Federation of Light, Barbara Marciniac with the Pleiadians and Phyllis Schlemmer’s Council of Nine. Many more have followed in their wake, perhaps numbering in the hundreds just in America alone, although most of them are not as well known.
I’ve attended four channeling sessions, by four different channelers, out of curiosity. What intrigued me about all of them, and about all channelers in general, is that it’s virtually impossible to know if they’re really channeling or if they’re faking it. Any rational person would tend to think even those who are not consciously faking it are in any case probably victims of some sort of dissociative personality disorder, or some kind of temporary psychological break from reality during which time they experience audio hallucinations. So I decided to see if any serious research had been done on this phenomenon by qualified behavioral scientists. To my surprise I found there has been some work done in this area of research.
I won’t bother to go into the details of that research now. Much of it has been summarized here:
http://bit.ly/9Bw5TB
The bottom line is that a number of explanations have been proposed from the results of the research. All of the explanations, of course, are based on the psychological and psychiatric data accumulated over the past hundred years or so. On the other hand, some of the research is based on more current science such as quantum mechanics. For example, the work of renowned theoretical physicist, David Bohm, is mentioned in the material on the page linked above. His idea of the “implicate and explicate” order, or realms of reality, was never really intended to explain the phenomenon of channeling. Nevertheless it does provide a basis for such an explanation that gets beyond the more conventional explanations derived from psychology and psychiatry. In fact, Bohm's idea (based in quantum physics) of how reality is structured (and there are several others in the field of quantum mechanics who tend to agree with his hypotheses) eventually boils down to something very similar to the explanations of channeling that are provided by the channeled entities themselves. In simplified terms, it often goes something like this: There is but One Source and we (along with the channeled entities themselves) are all part of that One Source. Therefore, there is always a natural channel of communication available between us, them (the channeled entities) and the One Source. But it occurred to me that there just might be yet another explanation for the channeling phenomenon. Let’s call it the Simulated Reality Hypothesis or SRH.
Sometime back in the 1980s my son told me that the video game arcade, where he liked to hang out, was going to be the first in the country to acquire a holographic video game. Instead of the characters in the game being displayed on a computer screen they would be displayed, in 3-Dimensional form, on a flat surface that you could view from every angle, 360 degrees around the platform.
Unfortunately, that turned out to be an unsubstantiated rumor and never came to pass. But it did spark a vision in my mind:
I suddenly envisioned the earth as a platform (metaphorically speaking) and that we humans are merely holographic projections moving around on that platform. Not only are we moving around but (and this was a little disturbing) perhaps we are being controlled to some degree by “someone” or some “thing”, in some other dimension. In other words, this invisible entity (or group of entities) is playing an incredibly sophisticated, high-tech, holographic computer game and we are the characters in a simulated reality.
By some “coincidence”, just a week or so after having this intuitive flash, I was introduced to a book called The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav. To my amazement, Zukav was talking about very similar ideas derived from the science of quantum physics. Then, just a couple weeks later, I was in a book store and just happened to stumble onto a book called The Holographic Universe by science writer, Michael Talbot. This book is basically an overview of some of the ideas of some of the world’s leading thinkers and researchers in the field of quantum physics. Among them is the aforementioned physicist, David Bohm. As I read through this book I became more and more convinced that this idea that we are living in a simulated reality just might be the truth of the matter.
Since then, of course, we’ve all been introduced to that idea through three incredible movies: The Matrix, The Thirteenth Floor, and Dark City. Maybe there’s more to the fundamental idea behind these movies than most people are willing to consider. More to the point, maybe this idea also provides an explanation for the phenomenon we call “channeling”.
Dr. Nick Bostrom, a philosophy professor at Oxford, has written a fascinating paper entitled “Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?”. It’s available online:
http://www.simulation-argument.com/
In the introduction Bostrom writes:
Many works of science fiction as well as some forecasts by serious technologists and futurologists predict that enormous amounts of computing power will be available in the future. Let us suppose for a moment that these predictions are correct. One thing that later generations might do with their super-powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears or of people like their forebears. Because their computers would be so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations. Suppose that these simulated people are conscious (as they would be if the simulations were sufficiently fine-grained and if a certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind is correct). Then it could be the case that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race. It is then possible to argue that, if this were the case, we would be rational to think that we are likely among the simulated minds rather than among the original biological ones. Therefore, if we don’t think that we are currently living in a computer simulation, we are not entitled to believe that we will have descendants who will run lots of such simulations of their forebears. That is the basic idea. The rest of this paper will spell it out more carefully.
The paper is well written and Bostrom does a terrific job of presenting a convincing case for the idea that we are, indeed, living in a simulated reality generated by an extremely powerful computer system. So, for the sake of argument, let’s assume he’s right.
If that’s the case, then perhaps the messages that channelers are receiving are being transmitted from the program that is running the simulation and/or from the entities (advanced humans or otherwise) that are controlling the program. Perhaps these transmissions are simply scripted material devised as part of an experiment, a research project designed to see what effect the “messages” will have on the channeler (the primary subject who is directly receiving the messages) as well as on the rest of the people who, in turn, receive the message from the channeler.
Or worse yet, what if it’s nothing that “scientific”? What if it’s just some random entity (or group of entities) in some other dimension, sitting around playing a computer game for no purpose other than their personal amusement?
On the one hand, it seems like a bizarre idea. On the other hand, if you think about it, you might agree with me that it’s no more bizarre than the notion that the channelers are receiving their messages from Light Beings, Angels, Aliens, Spirit Guides, Galactic Federations, the Council of Nine and an assortment of Ascended Masters.
What do you think?
******************
The Thirteenth Floor, movie trailer:
Dark City, Part-1 of 10:
I’ve attended four channeling sessions, by four different channelers, out of curiosity. What intrigued me about all of them, and about all channelers in general, is that it’s virtually impossible to know if they’re really channeling or if they’re faking it. Any rational person would tend to think even those who are not consciously faking it are in any case probably victims of some sort of dissociative personality disorder, or some kind of temporary psychological break from reality during which time they experience audio hallucinations. So I decided to see if any serious research had been done on this phenomenon by qualified behavioral scientists. To my surprise I found there has been some work done in this area of research.
I won’t bother to go into the details of that research now. Much of it has been summarized here:
http://bit.ly/9Bw5TB
The bottom line is that a number of explanations have been proposed from the results of the research. All of the explanations, of course, are based on the psychological and psychiatric data accumulated over the past hundred years or so. On the other hand, some of the research is based on more current science such as quantum mechanics. For example, the work of renowned theoretical physicist, David Bohm, is mentioned in the material on the page linked above. His idea of the “implicate and explicate” order, or realms of reality, was never really intended to explain the phenomenon of channeling. Nevertheless it does provide a basis for such an explanation that gets beyond the more conventional explanations derived from psychology and psychiatry. In fact, Bohm's idea (based in quantum physics) of how reality is structured (and there are several others in the field of quantum mechanics who tend to agree with his hypotheses) eventually boils down to something very similar to the explanations of channeling that are provided by the channeled entities themselves. In simplified terms, it often goes something like this: There is but One Source and we (along with the channeled entities themselves) are all part of that One Source. Therefore, there is always a natural channel of communication available between us, them (the channeled entities) and the One Source. But it occurred to me that there just might be yet another explanation for the channeling phenomenon. Let’s call it the Simulated Reality Hypothesis or SRH.
Sometime back in the 1980s my son told me that the video game arcade, where he liked to hang out, was going to be the first in the country to acquire a holographic video game. Instead of the characters in the game being displayed on a computer screen they would be displayed, in 3-Dimensional form, on a flat surface that you could view from every angle, 360 degrees around the platform.
Unfortunately, that turned out to be an unsubstantiated rumor and never came to pass. But it did spark a vision in my mind:
I suddenly envisioned the earth as a platform (metaphorically speaking) and that we humans are merely holographic projections moving around on that platform. Not only are we moving around but (and this was a little disturbing) perhaps we are being controlled to some degree by “someone” or some “thing”, in some other dimension. In other words, this invisible entity (or group of entities) is playing an incredibly sophisticated, high-tech, holographic computer game and we are the characters in a simulated reality.
By some “coincidence”, just a week or so after having this intuitive flash, I was introduced to a book called The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav. To my amazement, Zukav was talking about very similar ideas derived from the science of quantum physics. Then, just a couple weeks later, I was in a book store and just happened to stumble onto a book called The Holographic Universe by science writer, Michael Talbot. This book is basically an overview of some of the ideas of some of the world’s leading thinkers and researchers in the field of quantum physics. Among them is the aforementioned physicist, David Bohm. As I read through this book I became more and more convinced that this idea that we are living in a simulated reality just might be the truth of the matter.
Since then, of course, we’ve all been introduced to that idea through three incredible movies: The Matrix, The Thirteenth Floor, and Dark City. Maybe there’s more to the fundamental idea behind these movies than most people are willing to consider. More to the point, maybe this idea also provides an explanation for the phenomenon we call “channeling”.
Dr. Nick Bostrom, a philosophy professor at Oxford, has written a fascinating paper entitled “Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?”. It’s available online:
http://www.simulation-argument.com/
In the introduction Bostrom writes:
Many works of science fiction as well as some forecasts by serious technologists and futurologists predict that enormous amounts of computing power will be available in the future. Let us suppose for a moment that these predictions are correct. One thing that later generations might do with their super-powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears or of people like their forebears. Because their computers would be so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations. Suppose that these simulated people are conscious (as they would be if the simulations were sufficiently fine-grained and if a certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind is correct). Then it could be the case that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race. It is then possible to argue that, if this were the case, we would be rational to think that we are likely among the simulated minds rather than among the original biological ones. Therefore, if we don’t think that we are currently living in a computer simulation, we are not entitled to believe that we will have descendants who will run lots of such simulations of their forebears. That is the basic idea. The rest of this paper will spell it out more carefully.
The paper is well written and Bostrom does a terrific job of presenting a convincing case for the idea that we are, indeed, living in a simulated reality generated by an extremely powerful computer system. So, for the sake of argument, let’s assume he’s right.
If that’s the case, then perhaps the messages that channelers are receiving are being transmitted from the program that is running the simulation and/or from the entities (advanced humans or otherwise) that are controlling the program. Perhaps these transmissions are simply scripted material devised as part of an experiment, a research project designed to see what effect the “messages” will have on the channeler (the primary subject who is directly receiving the messages) as well as on the rest of the people who, in turn, receive the message from the channeler.
Or worse yet, what if it’s nothing that “scientific”? What if it’s just some random entity (or group of entities) in some other dimension, sitting around playing a computer game for no purpose other than their personal amusement?
On the one hand, it seems like a bizarre idea. On the other hand, if you think about it, you might agree with me that it’s no more bizarre than the notion that the channelers are receiving their messages from Light Beings, Angels, Aliens, Spirit Guides, Galactic Federations, the Council of Nine and an assortment of Ascended Masters.
What do you think?
******************
The Thirteenth Floor, movie trailer:
Dark City, Part-1 of 10:
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Crop Circle Similarities to Drone UFO case!
This crop circle appeared in the fields near Alton Barnes, England on or near July 26, 2010.
I recognized the similarities between this crop circle and...
1. the CARET "script" in the documents posted to the internet by "Isaac" in 2007.
http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/pacl-lang-analysis-p120-fullsize.jpg
2. The "Drone" UFO case from 2007.
http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/
Here are some images I put together to show some comparisons:
First image:
The "Football" shape in the crop circle stood out to me. Then when I looked at the image from the CARET documents at first I thought they were the same. But when I put the two side by side I could see they were different. Still, there is a similarity to the design elements in that some sections are lightened and some are darkened. In fact, there is a similarity between all the CARET drawings and the crop circle in terms of the the overall "graphic look" of the design elements. In the image below, the portion of the design from the CARET document has been rotated from its original position (in the document) to align more with the "Football" shape in the crop circle for comparison.
Second Image:
A portion from one of the CARET "schematic" renderings showing the strange "script", compared to the "script" in the crop circle for comparison. The characters appear to be similar but I couldn't find any exact matches.
For anyone not familiar with the "Drone" UFO case (one of the biggest and most controversial UFO cases of 2007) here is a website where all known information/research/photos/etc have been collected for easy reference:
http://www.ufo-blog.com/ufo-blog/2007/07/entire-2007-drone-ufo-sightings-reports.html
I found an old posting I'd made to another forum back then. It shows some of my photo analysis of some of the symbols on the underside of the "wing" of the craft. Interestingly (although no one else seems to have made the connection) there was a curious crop circle in Tennessee at the same time that I thought might have a connection to the Drone sightings. Here's a link to the images and the information I posted on that forum:
http://phantomsandmonsters.wetpaint.com/page/%22Drone%22+UFOs,+California
I recognized the similarities between this crop circle and...
1. the CARET "script" in the documents posted to the internet by "Isaac" in 2007.
http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/pacl-lang-analysis-p120-fullsize.jpg
2. The "Drone" UFO case from 2007.
http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/
Here are some images I put together to show some comparisons:
First image:
The "Football" shape in the crop circle stood out to me. Then when I looked at the image from the CARET documents at first I thought they were the same. But when I put the two side by side I could see they were different. Still, there is a similarity to the design elements in that some sections are lightened and some are darkened. In fact, there is a similarity between all the CARET drawings and the crop circle in terms of the the overall "graphic look" of the design elements. In the image below, the portion of the design from the CARET document has been rotated from its original position (in the document) to align more with the "Football" shape in the crop circle for comparison.
Second Image:
A portion from one of the CARET "schematic" renderings showing the strange "script", compared to the "script" in the crop circle for comparison. The characters appear to be similar but I couldn't find any exact matches.
For anyone not familiar with the "Drone" UFO case (one of the biggest and most controversial UFO cases of 2007) here is a website where all known information/research/photos/etc have been collected for easy reference:
http://www.ufo-blog.com/ufo-blog/2007/07/entire-2007-drone-ufo-sightings-reports.html
I found an old posting I'd made to another forum back then. It shows some of my photo analysis of some of the symbols on the underside of the "wing" of the craft. Interestingly (although no one else seems to have made the connection) there was a curious crop circle in Tennessee at the same time that I thought might have a connection to the Drone sightings. Here's a link to the images and the information I posted on that forum:
http://phantomsandmonsters.wetpaint.com/page/%22Drone%22+UFOs,+California
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Want to experience ET Contact? World's First ET Contact Webcast!
Paranormal Matrix is planning the world's first ET Contact Webcast on June 5, 2010 and you can sign up to be part of it!
Get the details here:
http://www.paranormalmatrix.tv/webcast.htm
An Extraordinary Perspective on the UFO/ET Phenomenon and the Danger of Disclosure
Whitely Strieber (perhaps the most famous of the alleged "alien contactees" on the planet) has written a fascinating and provocative article about the dangers of open contact with these "visitors" from another reality. In the opening paragraphs he states:
"Every few weeks, it seems, another announcement appears claiming that some authoritative group, usually involving the pope, the president, Edgar Mitchell and whomever, is about to announce that UFOs are no longer unknown, but are alien craft. I've been hearing about pending announcements like this for as long as I've had an interest in the subject, and they have always worried me. They worry me more than ever now.
"We are not in any way prepared for such an announcement, but the reason is not as straightforward as it may seem. There isn't likely to be any panic, at least not initially, but later there is apt to be. This isn't for the reason that Stephen Hawking recently suggested, that aliens might prove to be hostile, but because our visitors, if they are aliens in the conventional meaning of that word, are very, very different from us.
"One person who is never mentioned among those who might be involved in the disclosure process is me. Instead of allowing one of the very few people on earth, or indeed in its history, to have had much open contact to participate in the process in any way, I'm not simply marginalized, but carefully ignored on the theory that what I have to say would be too bizarre for people to accept."
Strieber then goes on to elaborate on how he has come to perceive the true nature of the "visitors" and just how bizarrely different they are from us.
"I believe that our visitors have a...hypercortex, that...gives them vastly more access to reality than we have. It provides them with the power to alter reality on the informational level, meaning that, for them, physics is not a set of laws that cannot be changed, but a tool that is easily amenable to manipulation.
"We see the world in a linear format that is imposed on us by the structure of the human brain. They see it on the vastly larger scale that a hypercortex with all of its additional properties provides them."
It is this extreme difference, Strieber suggests, that presents the danger.
"...if they appear here in numbers, they will not only enter our physical world, they will enter our minds. And, I can assure, you, that kind of contact is as hard a thing as a human being can experience. It is an agony beyond terror. I know. I have been there. "
Strieber is not saying full-scale contact with the aliens is impossible. He believes it is possible "...if we do this intelligently. We could make contact work, and take a huge leap forward as a species, rather than remaining as we are now in the nursery, or throwing ourselves off the cliff of premature contact." Strieber offers his suggestions about how to begin this process.
It's quite a thought-provoking article and, yes, the ideas presented will seem bizarre to some readers. Nevertheless, if you're intrigued by the UFO/ET phenomenon and the issue of full scale contact with the "visitors" then this article may give you a whole new perspective on the situation. Read the whole article here:
http://www.unknowncountry.com/journal/?id=416
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Alien Abduction: High Strangeness in Argentina
The Journal of Hispanic Ufology
By Raul Oscar Chaves
CIUFOS- La Pampa (Argentina)
(c) 2005 All Rights Reserved
In 1998, Gregorio T.R., 55, married, a resident of Santa Rosa, La Pampa and a watchman by profession, began to experience recurrent "contact" experiences with a strange entity. These have continued to take place through January 2005.
While performing his duties as a watchman at a computer school in Santa Rosa one evening, he went to the restroom and caught a glimpse of a strange creature moving behind him as he looked into a mirror. The entity was silver-colored and stood some 7 feet tall.
This event took place on December 6, 1998.
It should be noted that on two occasions the computers in the teaching facility were found to have lost their programming the next day, without the causes ever being established.
On December 28, 1998, a similar experience took place in the same city but at a service station, where the witness also performed security duties. On this occasion, the entity was seen standing upright in a hallway, one hand against the electric circuit breaker panel.
The entity, startled by the onlooker, spun around clumsily and looked at the witness, who described its gaze as "piercing" and the eyes having a green color. The witness reported feeling an intense burning sensation in its eyes for 30 days.
In this instance a mental or telepathic "dialogue" ensued in which the witness was told, "not to fear, that while he was not the chosen one, they would nonetheless be in contact with him."
N.O.S.E. Note: Believe it or not, this story gets even weirder. Read the complete story:
http://thechurchofufology.blogspot.com/2010/05/georgio.html
By Raul Oscar Chaves
CIUFOS- La Pampa (Argentina)
(c) 2005 All Rights Reserved
In 1998, Gregorio T.R., 55, married, a resident of Santa Rosa, La Pampa and a watchman by profession, began to experience recurrent "contact" experiences with a strange entity. These have continued to take place through January 2005.
While performing his duties as a watchman at a computer school in Santa Rosa one evening, he went to the restroom and caught a glimpse of a strange creature moving behind him as he looked into a mirror. The entity was silver-colored and stood some 7 feet tall.
This event took place on December 6, 1998.
It should be noted that on two occasions the computers in the teaching facility were found to have lost their programming the next day, without the causes ever being established.
On December 28, 1998, a similar experience took place in the same city but at a service station, where the witness also performed security duties. On this occasion, the entity was seen standing upright in a hallway, one hand against the electric circuit breaker panel.
The entity, startled by the onlooker, spun around clumsily and looked at the witness, who described its gaze as "piercing" and the eyes having a green color. The witness reported feeling an intense burning sensation in its eyes for 30 days.
In this instance a mental or telepathic "dialogue" ensued in which the witness was told, "not to fear, that while he was not the chosen one, they would nonetheless be in contact with him."
N.O.S.E. Note: Believe it or not, this story gets even weirder. Read the complete story:
http://thechurchofufology.blogspot.com/2010/05/georgio.html
Informal UFO/ET disclosure now happening in leaked UFO/ET reports via U.S. Capitol Police
An officer of the U.S. Capitol Police has leaked reports of UFO and hyperdimensional extraterrestrial spacecraft flyovers over the U.S. Capitol, using her active email account as a U.S. Capitol Police officer on the staff of the U.S. Senate Sergeant-at-Arms. The U.S. Capitol Police officer, who has requested anonymity, made available the leaked reports, written by a former U.S. Capitol employee, in 2008 and 2009 to researcher and author Robert M. Stanley after Mr. Stanley made research inquiries of the U.S. Capitol Police regarding Wilbur “Will” Allen’s documentation of 2002 UFO/ET flyovers over the U.S. Capitol.
The leaked reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer, which Mr. Stanley has examined and claims appear to be valid reports, confirm specific UFO/ET flyovers on April 22, 1999 and in spring 1995 in P-51 restricted airspace over the U.S. Capitol.
Mr. Stanley has made these leaked reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer public in an exclusive Exopolitics Radio interview with reporter Alfred Lambremont Webre, and in the Examiner.com article below.
These leaked reports contain prime eyewitness witness evidence of UFO/ET over flights over the U.S. Capitol by the U.S. Capitol Police, trained officers in charge of the physical safety of the U.S. Capitol area. The U.S. Capitol Police, according to Mr. Stanley, report to the National Security Agency (NSA) on matters relating to incursions into P-51 protected airspace by UFO/ET flyovers or landings on protected buildings, such as the U.S. Capitol, the White House, the reflecting pool, etc.
The leaked reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer confirm the assertions of Wilbur “Will” Allen, a former White House employee and Air Force One engineer under U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, that a U.S. Capitol Police officer had informed him in 2002 when he filed photos of UFO/ET flyover with them that the U.S. Capitol Police were experiencing similar UFO/ET flyovers over the U.S. Capitol to the ones Mr. Allen was photographing, as reported in a May 19, 2010 Examiner.com article, UFODC-Obama adviser says documented UFO/ET landings on U.S. Capitol “could destabilize society.
Read the complete story:
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2010m5d27-Informal-UFOET-disclosure-now-happening-in-leaked-UFOET-reports-via-US-Capitol-Police
The leaked reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer, which Mr. Stanley has examined and claims appear to be valid reports, confirm specific UFO/ET flyovers on April 22, 1999 and in spring 1995 in P-51 restricted airspace over the U.S. Capitol.
Mr. Stanley has made these leaked reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer public in an exclusive Exopolitics Radio interview with reporter Alfred Lambremont Webre, and in the Examiner.com article below.
These leaked reports contain prime eyewitness witness evidence of UFO/ET over flights over the U.S. Capitol by the U.S. Capitol Police, trained officers in charge of the physical safety of the U.S. Capitol area. The U.S. Capitol Police, according to Mr. Stanley, report to the National Security Agency (NSA) on matters relating to incursions into P-51 protected airspace by UFO/ET flyovers or landings on protected buildings, such as the U.S. Capitol, the White House, the reflecting pool, etc.
The leaked reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer confirm the assertions of Wilbur “Will” Allen, a former White House employee and Air Force One engineer under U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, that a U.S. Capitol Police officer had informed him in 2002 when he filed photos of UFO/ET flyover with them that the U.S. Capitol Police were experiencing similar UFO/ET flyovers over the U.S. Capitol to the ones Mr. Allen was photographing, as reported in a May 19, 2010 Examiner.com article, UFODC-Obama adviser says documented UFO/ET landings on U.S. Capitol “could destabilize society.
Read the complete story:
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2010m5d27-Informal-UFOET-disclosure-now-happening-in-leaked-UFOET-reports-via-US-Capitol-Police
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
